Popular Posts

Saturday, March 5, 2011

DMK snaps alliance with Cong in TN, opts out of UPA



The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam on Saturday withdrew from the United Progressive Alliance and broke off its alliance in Tamil Nadu after day-long confabulations within the party. Tamil Nadu chief minister and DMK patriarch M Karunanidhi was huddled with deputy chief minister MK Stalin, union chemicalsand fertilizers minister MK Alagiri, union textile minister Dayanidhi Maran, and other senior party colleagues at the DMK headquarters for the better part of the day and in the evening a high-level party meeting lasting about one and half hours decided to “free itself from the UPA” and break off its alliance with the Congress in Tamil Nadu.
Karunanidhi briefed the party leaders of all the developments that led to this decision  and said that with more seats available for the DMK to contest, it would be possible to win majority on our own, a senior DMK minister said.
The DMK would give issue-based support to the Manmohan Singh government, of which it has been a part since 2004, the DMK said in a resolution adopted at the high level meeting.
Announcing the decision, the DMK said “since the Congress seemed not interested in continuing with the alliance as is clear by its ever changing demands, we are breaking off the alliance in Tamil Nadu.”
The decision was welcomed by slogan shouting cadres who said “dump the Congress, we will win on our own”. The decision was also unanimous as leaders at the meeting felt that after so much tension, the cadres of the two parties may not jell on the ground. A senior minister of the DMK said “with Congress out of the way, by contesting more seats on our own, we can win a majority on our own.”
The chief minister had termed the Congress demand for 63 seats, after the DMK agreed to part with 60, and also insisting on the constituencies of its choice was unrealistic as well as unfair and saw in this a Congress unwillingness to continue with the alliance.
In the last assembly elections in 2006, the DMK and Congress fought in alliance under the DMK leadership. The Congress was allotted 48 seats and it won 34 and this time around, after the 2G scam broke out, the Congress plied on the pressure seeking initially 80 to 90 seats.
Three rounds of seat sharing agreements, the last between AICC Tamil Nadu incharge Ghulam Nabi Azad and chief minister Karunanidhi, at the end of which it seemed an agreement was on the cards with the Congress accepting 60 seats. However, the Congress suddenly scaled up its demand to 63 seats and also insisted on the choice of constituencies, which for the DMK chief upset and angry.
During the course of the day, the cadres at the DMK headquarters were waiting for a word from their leadership on snapping ties. And when the announcement was made at around 7.45 p.m., it was greeted with wild cheers and slogan shouting by the cadres.
The DMK sources said that all its ministers would go to Delhi and submit their resignations. All the DMK representatives in the cabinet and council of ministers would go to Delhi and resign from the union government.
"With each passing day it became apparent that the Congress did not want the alliance, which is why it kept changing its demands," the DMK resolution announcing the withdrawal from the UPA and snapping its alliance with Congress in Tamil Nadu.

ADMK snaps alliance with Cong in TN, opts out of UPA

       
The Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam on Saturday withdrew from the United Progressive Alliance and broke off its alliance in Tamil Nadu after day-long confabulations within the party. Tamil Nadu chief minister and DMK patriarch M Karunanidhi was huddled with deputy chief minister MK Stalin, union chemicaland fertilizers minister MK Alagiri, union textile minister Dayanidhi Maran, and other senior party colleagues at the DMK headquarters for the better part of the day and in the evening a high-level party meeting lasting about one and half hours decided to “free itself from the UPA” and break off its alliance with the Congress in Tamil Nadu. Karunanidhi briefed the party leaders of all the developments that led to this decision  and said that with more seats available for the DMK to contest, it would be possible to win majority on our own, a senior DMK minister said.
The DMK would give issue-based support to the Manmohan Singh government, of which it has been a part since 2004, the DMK said in a resolution adopted at the high level meeting.
Announcing the decision, the DMK said “since the Congress seemed not interested in continuing with the alliance as is clear by its ever changing demands, we are breaking off the alliance in Tamil Nadu.”
The decision was welcomed by slogan shouting cadres who said “dump the Congress, we will win on our own”. The decision was also unanimous as leaders at the meeting felt that after so much tension, the cadres of the two parties may not jell on the ground. A senior minister of the DMK said “with Congress out of the way, by contesting more seats on our own, we can win a majority on our own.”
The chief minister had termed the Congress demand for 63 seats, after the DMK agreed to part with 60, and also insisting on the constituencies of its choice was unrealistic as well as unfair and saw in this a Congress unwillingness to continue with the alliance.
In the last assembly elections in 2006, the DMK and Congress fought in alliance under the DMK leadership. The Congress was allotted 48 seats and it won 34 and this time around, after the 2G scam broke out, the Congress plied on the pressure seeking initially 80 to 90 seats.
Three rounds of seat sharing agreements, the last between AICC Tamil Nadu incharge Ghulam Nabi Azad and chief minister Karunanidhi, at the end of which it seemed an agreement was on the cards with the Congress accepting 60 seats. However, the Congress suddenly scaled up its demand to 63 seats and also insisted on the choice of constituencies, which for the DMK chief upset and angry.
During the course of the day, the cadres at the DMK headquarters were waiting for a word from their leadership on snapping ties. And when the announcement was made at around 7.45 p.m., it was greeted with wild cheers and slogan shouting by the cadres.
The DMK sources said that all its ministers would go to Delhi and submit their resignations. All the DMK representatives in the cabinet and council of ministers would go to Delhi and resign from the union government.
"With each passing day it became apparent that the Congress did not want the alliance, which is why it kept changing its demands," the DMK resolution announcing the withdrawal from the UPA and snapping its alliance with Congress in Tamil Nadu.

Coast guard apprehended 7 Pakistani



Jamnagar: The Indian Coast Guard has apprehended seven Pakistani men and detained a boat from the sea near the coastal Jakhau town in Kutch, an official said on Saturday.

"A Pakistani boat with seven men on board has been detained after it strayed into Indian waters yesterday late night. They are being taken to Okha for interrogation," an ICG official said.

The boat was spotted near Jakhau by the patrolling party on board ICG's vessel -- Meerabai, he said. 'Meerabai' is one of the patrolling boats used by the Indian Coast Guard for sea surveillance here. (

mediarockz

mediarockz

Sheen seduces 1.3 million Twitter fans in two days


Los Angeles:  Troubled American actor Charlie Sheen was Thursday reveling in the fact that his new Twitter account had attracted some 1.3 million followers in just two days.

"In all sincerity... Thank you Twitter community for the warm reception & the followers that helped get me to 1M in 24 hours!!!" he said in a tweet posted late Wednesday.

By Thursday though the number of his followers had swelled to 1.3 million, who had to be satisfied with a mere 21 tweets, accompanied by a couple of pictures, posted by Sheen on the micro-blogging social network.

Most of his messages were not too coherent, although he did ask: "Pardon my absence.... My first concern is my kids... Back soon..!"


Sheen, 45, said on Wednesday that police had taken his twin two-year-old sons, Max and Bob, away overnight after his estranged wife expressed concern for their welfare.

But Sheen has disputed allegations that his wild lifestyle, including drug-addled binges and sharing his home with two girlfriends he called "goddesses," is anything other than a nurturing environment for his children.

Producers last week cancelled the actor's hit television show, "Two and a Half Men" in mid-season, after he gave several rambling interviews, some of which included abusive statements toward his employers at CBS television.

He is also battling allegations of anti-Semitism and claims of death threats against his estranged wife, Brooke Mueller, the mother of the twins, who, like Sheen, is said to be battling drug abuse.

The @charliesheen feed was started Tuesday, and his first tweet was a cheeky photo showing Sheen with one of his new girlfriends holding a bottle of "Naked" brand juice.

"Winning...! Choose your Vice..." the tweet said, adding a link to the picture of him sporting a backwards baseball cap and holding a healthy milk drink.

But despite his new-found Twitter stardom, Sheen is still trailing far behind singer Lady Gaga who has some 8.5 million followers.

Black money case: Action will be taken against Hassan Ali Khan, says Pranab


New Delhi:  Union Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee today said the government has taken note of the Supreme Court's observations and action will be taken against Pune-based stud farm owner Hassan Ali Khan who is facing charges of stashing huge amounts of money in tax havens. (Read: Who is Hassan Ali Khan?)

"That is being taken care of. We have noted the observations of the Supreme Court. All appropriate action will be taken," he said on the sidelines of a CII meet when asked if the government was contemplating any action against Khan.

The Enforcement Directorate (ED) had yesterday issued a 'Look out Circular' at all airports against Khan to ensure that he did not flee the country.
   
Khan is facing charges of stashing away over US $ 8 billion in Swiss banks. In 2009, he was served a notice for a tax demand for about Rs. 40,000 crore.
    
Lambasting the Centre for not having the "will power" to act against black money hoarders, the apex court on March 3 asked why Khan and others were not subjected to custodial interrogation despite the probe agencies possessing sufficient materials.

"What the hell is going on in this country," an anguished court had asked.

In connection with the black money case involving Khan, the Supreme Court had in February also asked the Centre to ensure that Khan did not leave the country.

Food diplomacy to check violence against Indians in Oz









food diplomacy
Ainslie and Robert Bos
AMRITSAR: After government efforts failed to check street violence against Indian students in Australia, Australian civil society has begun to try food diplomacy to forge amicable relations and cultural understanding between Indians and Australians.

Uniting Church in Melbourne has started hosting monthly dinners for Indian students so they could talk about their fear and hardships in an attempt to make them feel welcome in Australia, said the visiting educator of Uniting Church in Australia, Robert Bos, while talking to TOI on Saturday.

"We are a multi cultural society and initiatives like hosting dinners will help build cordial relations," Bos said.

He also said that a local enthusiast Mia Northrop had launched a 'Vindaloo Against Violence' campaign to curb hostility against Indians. Mia has been inviting Australians to have dinner at Indian restaurants on particular days.

Bos who has attended one such dinner said that these events provide an opportunity to both Indians and Australians to understand each other and also enjoy Indian food.

He said not only Indians, but all the Asian students who come to Australia to study, make an important contribution to the country's economy.

"The bashing of Indians did upset us, there is a very small racial minority in whites but then there have been many incidents of violence within different factions of the Indian community too," he said.

Ainslie Bos said that taxi drivers were the main targets since they carried a lot of cash with them which made them vulnerable.

"It is not that only Indian taxi drivers are targeted but those from other countries too," she said.

She however added that many Indian students were misguided by agents who told them that they could permanently stay in Australia. Therefore the Australian government had to frame strict policies.

Nepal Maoists rejoin government









KATHMANDU: Nepal's tottering, one-month-old communist government received a shot in the arm on Friday when its major ally - and frequently major foe as well - the Maoists finally condescended to join the cabinet, after weeks of keeping Prime Minister Jhala Nath Khanal on tenterhooks.

However, remaining true to Nepal's politics of discord, the former guerrillas sent only a mini contingent of four ministers after differences erupted between Maoist supremo Pushpa Kamal Dahal Prachanda and his two deputies, Dr Baburam Bhattarai and Mohan Vaidya, preventing the party from naming all the 11 ministers they have been allotted.

A relieved Khanal, who had been stumbling along with just three ministers under him, administered the oath of office and secrecy to the four Maoist ministers at the presidential office, Shital Niwas, in Kathmandu Friday evening. Led by former Maoist information and communications minister Krishna Bahadur Mahara, who got the same ministry once again, the others are Khadga Bahadur Bishwokarma (tourism and civil aviation ministry), Top Bahadur Raymajhi (physical planning and works) and Barsha Man Pun Ananta (peace and reconstruction ministry).

While Mahara and Bishwokarma are former ministers, the latter having been women, children and social welfare minister in an earlier government, the other two are first timers. Though two women were being considered, none of them made it to the first lot of ministers. Bishwokarma comes from the Dalit community.

With the swearing-in, the Maoists return to power 23 months after the collapse of Prachanda's government in May 2009. The development comes as a matter of concern for New Delhi, especially the allocation of portfolios. With Ananta getting the peace and reconstruction ministry, India's concern about Nepal's halted peace process and the fate of nearly 20,000 People's Liberation Army combatants, is bound to mount. A succession of visiting Indian ministers and top officials had urged that the PLA should be disbanded before the promulgation of the new constitution and Indian Army top brass in the past have been on record as saying that the PLA should not be inducted into the Nepal Army. A Maoist minister will give the former rebels an advantage during planning and negotiations.

With growing Indian companies employed in infrastructure projects in Nepal, a Maoist minister ruling the roost will also add to Indian worries. The recently concluded bilateral trade talks in New Delhi had seen the Indian side harp on the protection of Indian investment in the republic with Dabur Nepal and United Telecom Ltd being enumerated as instances of harassment and discrimination.

The continued absence of a foreign minister also affects India's further diplomatic lobbying. South Block has been eager to discuss visiting dates for Indian External Affairs Minister SM Krishna but the visit has been put on hold due to Nepal's council of ministers functioning without a foreign minister.

Not a veiled threat: Burqa ban in France from April








Not a veiled threat
France will start enforcing a ban next month on full Islamic face veils, officials said, meaning any veiled woman can be summoned to a police station and asked to remove her face-covering or pay a fine.
PARIS:Francewill start enforcing a ban next month on full Islamic face veils, officials said, meaning any veiled woman can be summoned to a police station and asked to remove her face-covering or pay a fine.

Officials say the law is mainly symbolic and police will not call in every veiled woman they see to avoid stigmatising Muslims. But a Paris imam said forcing veiled women to present themselves at a police station would be just as uncomfortable.

When France passed the ban on full face veils last year, Muslim leaders voiced concern that it could lead to veiled Muslim women being unfairly treated by police or singled out for harassment.

"My gut reaction is to say this is all a bit clumsy," said Moussa Niambele, the imam of a mosque in Paris.

The ban forbids wearing any garment concealing the face in a public space, namely the street, public transport, shops, schools, courtrooms, hospitals and government buildings. From April 11, police are instructed to summon veil-wearers to a station, where they will be asked to remove the garment for "identification" and leave it off. If the wearer refuses to remove it they will be fined up to $208.

117 mobile numbers in one woman's name in Delhi

Mobile Phones
According to police, forgery in mobile phone connections have grown rampant in Delhi. This picture is for representational purposes only. (TOI Photo)
NEW DELHI: A 34-year-old woman living in Turkman Gate recently discovered that she had 117 mobile connections in her name. Not once had she applied herself, and not one number belonged to her.

The only clue: she may have photocopied her voter ID sometime, say cops, which was used by several others as ID proof to get a mobile connection.

The DoT ( department of telecommunications) chanced upon her name in a random survey of customers' addresses. DoT has raised concerns of connections being given on forged documents, which are even used many times over by cellular operators to expand their customer base.

The woman in Turkman Gate (name withheld), belongs to a minority community and lives with her brother, having been abandoned by her husband. Until sleuths came knocking on her door, she was unaware that her name, identity and address had been misused in a public database.

"We believe that the woman might have photocopied her election ID card sometime in the past three years. There are some connections in her name which are around two years old. We suspect some unscrupulous persons used her ID for their own benefits," a officer who is part of the investigations said. "The woman has been cleared of any role in the incident. We have interrogated some men in the neighbourhood with interests in local PCOs, photocopy shops and mobile phone retailers, but we could not fix responsibility on anyone."

Officially, Delhi police remained tightlipped on the investigations though sources said 117 connections had been unearthed in the Turkman Gate case. Local cops have reportedly sent a report to the security agencies on this issue.

Earlier, in the first such case against major cellular operators, DoT had lodged a case of cheating and forgery against three service providers who had allegedly submitted forged documents with the department in order to expand their customer base across Delhi and NCR.

"We have registered three cases against three service providers after the ADG of the Telecom Enforcement Resources and Monitoring Cell, Akmal Hussain registered their complaint with us. DoT has carried out its own preliminary inquiries before approaching us," DCP (crime) Ashok Chand said. "The cases have been registered under sections IPC 420 (cheating), 468 (Forgery for the purpose of cheating), 471 (using as genuine a forged document) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) against the companies.

Under the rules, these companies had to verify whether the addresses provided by their dealers were genuine. But, preliminary inquiries show that on many occasions, the company management had not stopped services even when they noticed the forgery," he said.

Police said forgery had grown rampant over the past few years. "So far, around 143 such complaints have been verified to be true but we are still a long way off from even finishing the investigations," said a senior officer of the Inter State Unit of the crime branch, which is investigating the case. "There are similar allegations against at least two other service providers. The problems seem to have been come to the fore only since June 2009 when DoT detected such forgery in Delhi for the first time and sent notices to the respective companies."

Tendulkar says no to honorary doctorate



Sachin Tendulkar
BANGALORE: Citing professional reasons, master blaster Sachin Tendulkar is said to have turned down the honorary doctorate to be conferred on him by the Rajiv Gandhi University of Health Sciences (RGUHS).

Tendulkar is said to have told the RGUHS V-C, registrar and two syndicate members that he wasn't inclined to accept the varsity honour as he was still active in professional cricket. He said that he had declined similar honour from other universities abroad and respected the decision of the university to confer the title on him.

The university is now awaiting an official regret letter from him, which will be forwarded to governor HR Bhardwaj, who is the chancellor of the university.

The health varsity syndicate will meet on March 8 to discuss the issue. With Sachin declining the offer, some members say that the university might not confer honorary doctorate in this year's convocation.

In a strange coincidence, two universities - RGUHS and University of Mysore - chose to honour the cricketer this year. The University of Mysore is yet to communicate to him their decision to honour him.

Egypt's new PM speaks at Tahrir Square



Cairo:  Carried on the shoulders of protesters who claimed him as their own, Egypt's new prime minister waded into a crowd of tens of thousands in Tahrir Square on Friday, delivering a speech bereft of regal bombast that illustrated the reach of Egypt's nascent revolution and the breadth of demonstrators' demands that remain unanswered.

"I am here to draw my legitimacy from you," Prime Minister Essam Sharaf told the raucous, flag-waving assembly. "You are the ones to whom legitimacy belongs."

Even some protesters dismissed the speech as the savvy move of an ambitious politician in a time fraught with anxiety. Yet it was perhaps the symbolism itself that said the most about Friday's moment when, just a day after his appointment, an Egyptian leader chose to make his first stop the square that helped topple his predecessor.

The burst of euphoria that greeted uprisings in Tunisia and Egypt has faded somewhat, with the bloodshed in Libya and the retrenchment of governments in Yemen and Bahrain.

But protesters said Mr. Sharaf's appearance illustrated the new, if hesitant, calculus in the Arab world: the power of protests -- or, simply, the expression of popular demands -- to bring about change long left to a clique of officials around Arab strongmen.

The sentiment coursed through the protest, which rivaled some of the more modest days of the 18-day Egyptian uprising. In a celebratory atmosphere that was tinged with anger and resolve, the demonstrators seized the opportunity to demand that Mr. Sharaf undertake far deeper change than the largely cosmetic reforms Egypt's military rulers have parceled out since taking power from President Hosni Mubarak on Feb. 11.

"This shows you that the power of our ideas -- the idea of democracy, of people claiming their own legitimacy, of our right to choose -- have come to reality," said Mohammed Ali, a 42-year-old film director. "Freedom can do the impossible."

Protesters had described Friday's gathering as a "day of determination," pressing their call for the resignation of Mr. Sharaf's predecessor, Ahmed Shafiq, whom Mr. Mubarak had appointed to lead the cabinet before resigning. But the Supreme Council of the Armed Forces, with timing that appeared aimed at heading off bigger crowds, announced Mr. Shafiq's resignation on Thursday with three terse lines on its Facebook page.

A former transportation minister, Mr. Sharaf served in government only briefly, until December 2005, then became one of the higher-profile politicians to occasionally join the demonstrations in Tahrir Square, endearing him to many there.

On Friday, protesters suggested that he had been their candidate to replace Mr. Shafiq, a former air force general like Mr. Mubarak, who came across as haughty at best, inept at worst.

His challenges, though, remain vast, not least in choosing new figures as foreign, interior and justice ministers. Other demands -- from dismantling the more odious police forces to freeing thousands of political prisoners -- may be beyond his purview in a landscape where the military, in almost uncontested fashion, makes the decisions.

"In a transition period, you could have a change of cabinet every few weeks," said Samer Soliman, a political science professor at the American University in Cairo. "It's a time of political instability."

"They," he added, referring to the military's Supreme Council, "are probably just trying the guy out to see if he works with the population."

Even Mr. Sharaf seemed to plead with the protesters to have patience. "I beg you, you did something great and together we will do more," he said, as the crowd chanted "We are with you." He added, "I have a heavy task and it will need patience."

Mr. Sharaf entered the square a little before Friday Prayer services, drawing cries from the crowd and a few surprises, as he headed toward the Mugamma, a sprawling bureaucratic fortress redolent of Soviet-era design. "The prime minister has come!" one man shouted excitedly. To which another responded, "What's his name again?"

If Mr. Sharaf meant to strike a different note on Friday, he did. He traveled with a few members of the military police in red berets and a few more men in dark sunglasses, their numbers paling before the phalanxes of security guards that usually accompany Egyptian officials.

In his remarks, there was none of the stentorian paternalism of Mr. Mubarak, who addressed Egyptians as his sons and daughters in his last speech. "If you would permit me," Mr. Sharaf repeatedly asked the crowd. Dispensing with customary formal Arabic, he spoke in Egyptian slang, standing before them in a gray jacket and white shirt, with no tie.

In a way, the speech was a striking legacy of the uprising: the reimagining of power that once sought prestige though its very distance from those without it.

"Sharaf is the first official that everyone wants," said Mohamed Mostafa, a young member of the Muslim Brotherhood from the Nile Delta. "He promises to implement all our demands, and we trust him because he was protesting in Tahrir with us."

The utopian sense of Tahrir Square has long faded. Only a few people picked up trash on Friday and gone were the pharmacies, health clinics and the uprising's equivalent of soup kitchens that cared for the tens of thousands who camped out here for days. Yet while some thought Mr. Mubarak's resignation might dissipate the protests, Friday's turnout represented a clear signal that the demonstrations had the vitality to continue.

In fact, Mr. Shafiq's resignation was unlikely without the continuing protests.

"From here until the elections for a new parliament, the only way to voice our demands is protests," said Ashraf Ismail, a 29-year-old engineer. "They have to go on."

A banner put it differently: "We want the overthrow of the rest of the regime."

The demands articulated Friday remain formidable -- from forcing out the most loathed ministers to dismantling the nefarious State Security service. Others called for a trial of government figures, from Mr. Mubarak down, and the lifting of the Emergency Law, which has granted the government extensive powers to arrest and detain people for decades.

Mr. Ali, the film director, acknowledged the difficulty in realizing those demands. But, he added, "this is the accomplishment of the revolution. There's a tomorrow."

He sexually assaulted 80-year-olds over 17 years


London:  A 53-year-old man has been charged with sexually assaulting vulnerable octogenarians, including an Alzheimer's and a Parkinson's patient, over a 17-year period, a media report said.

Delroy Grant, a married father of nine - dubbed the Night Stalker - allegedly conducted a planned series of rapes, sexual assaults and burglaries targeting both men and women, most of them in their eighties, the Daily Telegraph reported.

The cab driver from Brockley, southeast London, wore a mask, cut the telephone lines and removed light bulbs before striking, always at night, prosecutors told the Woolwich Crown Court.

Among the victims was an 82-year-old woman suffering from Alzheimer's disease and an 83-year-old man, who was partly blind, deaf and suffered from Parkinson's disease.

The eldest victim was 89.

The alleged offences took place between 1992 and 2009 at 18 addresses across south London, the prosecution said.

Grant raped or attempted to rape four of his elderly victims and carried out indecent and sexual assaults against seven others.

The court was told Grant's DNA was recovered at 12 of the 18 incident sites.

Grant has, however, denied all charges, claiming that his ex-wife had conspired with a male friend to frame him for the crimes.

Giant set of Olympic rings unveiled in London


London:  A giant set of Olympic rings has been unveiled at one of London's busiest train stations with less than 17 months to go before the start of the 2012 Games.

The five intersecting aluminium rings - measuring 20 meters wide and 9 meters high and weighing 2,300 kilograms - were suspended on Thursday from the roof of a platform at St. Pancras International station in central London.

London Mayor Boris Johnson marked the launch in his usual humorous style as the giant Olympic rings were unveiled at London's St Pancras station.

"The first thing anyone sees when they arrive on the Eurostar (international trains) is a gentle and tactful reminder to our French friends that London won the right to host the games in 2012 - and every single day I am more glad than ever that we did," he said.

Olympic organisers will place more rings at other iconic landmarks across London over the course of the next year.

St. Pancras was selected as the first site because many visitors to the games will pass through the station on their way to the Olympic Park in east London.

Many fans from Europe are expected to head to London on the train, and the rings will be e first thing they see when they arrive.

Tamil Nadu: Congress-DMK rift over seat sharing worsens


Chennai:  Just a month ahead of Assembly polls in Tamil Nadu, the seven-year-old Congress-DMK alliance seems to be on the verge of collapse as the partners cannot agree on seat sharing. 

Sources have told NDTV that DMK's TR Baalu is likely to meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee to convey that the party could even withdraw its support to the UPA govt.

The two parties have held three rounds of discussions on seat sharing for the April 13 Assembly elections, but there has been little headway. The Congress wants to contest many more seats than the 48 it had fought on in the last elections and, if the alliance comes to power, wants to be included in the government.

DMK chief Karunanidhi is appalled.  He says he has offered 60 seats, but the 63 that the Congress wants is unfair
In a statement in Chennai, Karunanidhi said, "According to the formula, both parties agreed the Congress would get only 51 seats. But we offered 60 seats. Is it right to demand 63 seats? Is it fair to expect us to okay constituencies they choose? DMK's high-level meet on Saturday will take an appropriate decision."

The DMK will hold an internal meeting on Saturday to discuss the Congress' demands, and will also discuss its election manifesto.

With all the controversy that the partners have been mired in in the last few months, coupled with the traditional anti-incumbency challenge, this will not be an easy election to fight. It does not help that the past few weeks have been tough on the Congress-DMK relationship with the CBI's investigation into the 2G scam extending to some of the DMK's senior-most leaders, including Karunanidhi's daughter Kanimozhi. A Raja, the DMK leader who was Telecom Minister till November and was forced to resign much to the DMK's chagrin, is now in jail.

Tamil Nadu will vote on April 13, and the results will be declared on May 13 for the state's 234 seats.

Angry Bangladesh fans stone West Indies team bus


Dhaka: The bus carrying the West Indies players has been stoned on its way back to the team hotel after they thrashed Bangladesh by nine wickets in Mirpur. There were no injuries, the team management confirmed to ESPNcricinfo, and both squads were safely back at the hotel but the players were shaken.

News of the incident spread across the world within moments, evoking memories of the attack on the Sri Lanka team bus in Lahore almost exactly two years ago - though that was far more serious - and will raise questions about the security provided to teams at the tournament.

"This is some b*******," Chris Gayle tweeted moments after the incident. "Bangladesh stoning our bus!!! Freaking glass break!!! This is c***, can't believe..what next bullets!!!! Kiss teeth".

The team's media manager, Philip Spooner, confirmed that two windows cracked, but none shattered, and hence no stone made its way inside. "We left the ground, and on our way back to the hotel, a couple of stones did hit our window," Spooner said. "We are now back at the hotel, both teams are back at the hotel and are safe."

The incident occurred after West Indies completed a crushing nine-wicket victory over the hosts in a match that lasted all of 31.1 overs. The discontent among the crowd could be seen when they started throwing the placards that have "4" and "6" written on them onto the playing field the moment Bangladesh lost their last wicket to be bowled out for their lowest-ever ODI total - 58.

The stones hit the bus when it was about three minutes on its way back to the hotel. Spooner said that the team manager, Richie Richardson, would notify the respective boards and the ICC soon. There was no panic, he said. "Just make sure you mention that nobody got hurt, everybody is safe. There is no panic, everybody is fine."

Gayle was not that calm about it. He tweeted again: "This is ridiculous!!! Damn!!! W Cup with so many security an this happen!! Big Joke!!! Trust me I'm not keen here!!! Av (every) players lay flat!!!"

A Bangladesh police official said the fans had mistaken the West Indies bus for the Bangladesh bus. "The fans thought it was the Bangladeshi team bus and they hurled stones at it," Imtiaz Ahmed, deputy commissioner of police in Dhaka, told AFP. "The window panes were shattered, but no one was injured."

Singapore appoints Sikh as its Army chief


Singapore:  Singapore has appointed Brigadier General Ravinder Singh as its next Army chief, the first Sikh in 30 years to be given the force's baton.

Singh, 41, takes over from Major-General Chan Chun Sing on March 25, Straits Times reported.

A Singaporean of Indian origin, Singh, is currently Deputy Secretary (Technology) at the Defence Ministry. He joined the Singapore Armed Forces in December 1982.

Singh also served as assistant chief of General Staff (plans), head of Joint Communications and Information Systems Department, and Chief of Staff - Joint Staff.


Brig Gen Singh is also the first non-Chinese Chief of Army in nearly 30 years.

Colonel Mancharan Singh Gill was the first ever when he took up the post in 1982, the report said.

Though Major-General Chan is retiring as announced by the Defence Ministry, local media speculates that he would be standing in the coming general election for a parliamentary seat under the banner of the ruling party Peoples Action Party.

For rape, she was offered Rs. 2100



Allahabad:  In the fields of Sarai Sultan, a small village near Allahabad, a woman in her early forties, holds up her fingers, indicating 12.

At noon, she was at work as a farm hand, when the man who lives next door to her allegedly attacked her and raped her.

She couldn't have cried for help. She cannot speak, she is hearing impaired. Her husband was working nearby, but he too cannot speak or hear.

It was another village who discovered her, lying battered in millet fields.

The man who raped her confessed to the village panchayat. The council's decision: that he should pay her Rs. 2100 as compensation.

The head of the panchayat, Lal Man Pasi, says he consulted with many residents of the area who agreed that the punishment was just.

The outraged couple asked for their families' support - and then took their case to the police. "We don't want money....will that help restore our dignity?" asks the victim's brother-in-law.

"We have registered a case and are looking for the panchayat members and the accused... we think it is a case of attempt to rape. But during the investigations, if the rape allegation is found to be true, then we will act accordingly," says J P Pandey, a senior policeman handling the case.

Medical tests are likely to be conducted to establish if it was a case of rape. Meanwhile, the four panchayat members along with the accused have gone missing.

'Osama bin Laden of Internet' still speaks on YouTube



Washington:  From the shootings at Fort Hood, Tex., to the stabbing of a British member of Parliament, investigators have identified Anwar al-Awlaki's stirring online calls to jihad as an important instigator of terrorism.

So members of Congress last year appealed to YouTube to remove calls for violence by Mr. Awlaki, the militant American-born cleric now hiding in Yemen, and in an announcement reported around the world last November, YouTube agreed.

End of story?

Not at all. A quick search of YouTube today for "Anwar al-Awlaki" finds hundreds of his videos, most of them scriptural commentary or clerical advice, but dozens that include calls for jihad or attacks on the United States.


The story of You Tube and Mr. Awlaki is a revealing case study in the complexity of limiting controversial speech in the age of do-it-yourself media, as the House prepares for hearings next week on the radicalization of American Muslims.

In eloquent American English or Arabic with English subtitles, Mr. Awlaki can be seen in videos decrying America's "war on Islam"; warning Muslims why they should "never, ever trust a kuffar," or non-Muslim; praising the attempt by his "student" to blow up a Detroit-bound airliner; and patiently explaining why American civilians are legitimate targets for killings. Such videos have been posted in multiple copies and viewed hundreds or thousands of times.

Since YouTube relies on viewers to flag objectionable material, and only a fraction of Mr. Awlaki's videos violates its rules, it was never likely that his pronouncements would disappear from the site. Even if they did, scores of other sites without YouTube's rules also host the declarations -- written, audio or video -- of Mr. Awlaki, the man some have called the Osama bin Laden of the Internet.

"There's no way as a practical matter to wipe this material off the face of the Internet," said John B. Morris Jr., general counsel at the Center for Democracy and Technology, a nonprofit group in Washington. "It's very unrealistic to believe that any action of any American company or American politician can keep this material off the Web."

But Evan F. Kohlmann, a terrorism analyst with the consulting company Flashpoint Global Partners, who has followed Mr. Awlaki for years, acknowledged the difficulties but said that YouTube should make a greater effort to curtail his pro-terrorism message.

"YouTube has become a major alternative distribution point for jihadi propaganda, especially for homegrown militants who may not have the pedigree to gain access to the classic password-protected jihadi chat forums," Mr. Kohlmann said, referring to militant sites that restrict access. "If you don't have online friends who can sneak you in, and if you don't speak Arabic, then YouTube may be the best available option."

Mr. Kohlmann said that while it might not be easy or cheap, "there are ways of removing this material in a relatively expeditious manner."

YouTube, the six-year-old California-based powerhouse of Web video which is owned by Google, says that every minute, day and night, it receives an average of 35 hours of video from millions of contributors. That ratio makes prescreening impractical, said Victoria Grand, YouTube's head of communications and policy.

Instead, just as YouTube relies on its users to provide content, it relies on them to police the content. The site posts its "community guidelines," which prohibit incitements to violence, hate speech, bomb-making instructions and postings by a member of a designated terrorist organization. A signed-in YouTube user who objects to a video clicks on the "flag" beneath it and indicates the reasons for a complaint by clicking on a label: for instance, "nudity," "child abuse," "animal abuse" or "mass advertising."

In the case of terrorism-related material, objections could fall in the categories "violent or repulsive conduct," including subcategories for "physical attack" or -- in a label added last November after complaints about Mr. Awlaki -- "promotes terrorism." Militant messages could be "hateful or abusive content," with a subcategory for "promotes hatred or violence."

Then YouTube reviewers look at the flagged videos with the assistance of sophisticated software. Any video that violates the company's guidelines is removed, Ms. Grand said.

"We encourage our users to continue to bring this material to our attention," she said. "We review flagged videos around the clock."

The system has prevented YouTube from succumbing to the otherwise inevitable flood of pornography, which is directed to reviewers by software that scans uploaded videos for flesh tones. Computers also give priority to the review of videos with a high "flag-to-view ratio," suggesting that many viewers are upset about it. Software bumps to a low priority videos that have previously been reviewed, as well as those flagged by users who have a record of, say, objecting to every Justin Bieber video.

YouTube explained this system, but declined to say how many employees review videos, what percentage are reviewed, and how many are removed, either over all or specifically relating to Mr. Awlaki.

But Ms. Grand, the company official, explained the importance of context. A video that shows bullying (one banned category) might be permitted if it is intended to educate the public about the hazards of such behavior.

The variety and volume of Mr. Awlaki's YouTube material makes it more difficult than might be supposed to decide its fate. Should his sermon on what makes a good marriage come down? His account of the final moments of the Prophet Muhammad? His counsel on the proper diet for a good Muslim?

Such material does not violate any YouTube standard. But there is evidence that those inspired by Mr. Awlaki to plot violence usually were first drawn by his engaging lectures, including Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, the Army psychiatrist charged in the Fort Hood shootings; the young men who planned to attack Fort Dix, N.J.; and the 21-year-old British student who told the police she stabbed a member of Parliament last May after watching 100 hours of Awlaki videos.

Even Mr. Awlaki's most incendiary material appears in widely varying contexts on YouTube. A long interview he gave last year justifying violence against Americans, for instance, appears in some videos with the logo of Al Qaida's media wing, but in others as excerpted in newscasts by CNN and Al Jazeera.

Representative Anthony Weiner, Democrat of New York, a prominent Congressional voice in calling for YouTube to remove Mr. Awlaki's material (he can be seen doing so on YouTube), said he recognized that the company is "wrestling with a difficult issue" and opposed any government ban, which would be likely to violate constitutional protections for free speech.

Still, Mr. Weiner said, he thinks YouTube "could do a better job," adding, "I'd give them a C with an opportunity to improve."

It may be that the crowdsourcing that drives YouTube, its reliance on the masses, becomes the ultimate answer to violent messages on the site, more than company censors. Anti-jihad activists with names like the YouTube Smackdown Corps patrol the site constantly, flagging what they consider to be offensive material.

At a site called Jihadi Smackdown of the Day ("Countering the cyber-jihad one video at a time"), the links for past YouTube videos of Mr. Awlaki now usually lead to a standard message: "This video has been removed as a violation of YouTube's policy."

Gaddafi brutalises foes, armed or defenceless



Tripoli, Libya:  Col. Muammar el-Gaddafi counterattacked with brutal force on Friday, battling rebel forces on two fronts, firing on unarmed protesters in front of international news media and leaving the rebels seeking his ouster in disarray.

His militia's actions seemed likely to stir renewed debate over international intervention to limit his use of military power against his own citizens, possibly by imposing a no-flight zone.

About 30 miles outside the capital, the elite Khamis Brigade, a militia named for the Gaddafi son who commands it, surrounded the rebel-controlled town of Zawiyah and opened fire with mortars, machine guns and other heavy weapons, witnesses said, in two separate skirmishes.

The first was arguably provoked by rebels who tried to attack the better-equipped militia because it was blocking rebel supporters from entering the town, the witnesses said. But the second, described as a "massacre" by rebel witnesses, took aim at a group of unarmed protesters who attempted to march through the militia lines toward the capital.

A rebel making a count at the Zawiyah hospital said that at least 35 rebels and an unknown number of militia soldiers died in the fighting, with more than 60 rebels missing and more than 50 wounded. Among the dead, rebels said, was Col. Hussein Darbouk, a defected Libyan officer who had been commanding rebel forces in the town.

"We killed a lot of their people, but obviously they have more power than us, to be quite honest," said one rebel, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Others spoke of violence directed against unarmed civilians.

"I cannot describe the enormity of the violence they are committing against us," one resident said in a telephone interview, with gunfire in the background.

By nightfall there were contradictory reports about the fate of the city. A spokesman for the government said its forces had retaken Zawiyah. "It is liberated this afternoon," said the spokesman, Majid al-Dursi, "and we are going to take you there tomorrow to see for yourself."

But in interviews throughout the night, rebels said they still controlled the city up to its gates, though some said they worried about the night ahead -- especially after midnight, one witness said, after the electricity was cut off and the town went dark.

Around the same time as the afternoon battle in Zawiyah, two truckloads of government security officers showered hundreds of protesters with tear gas in the Tripoli suburb of Tajura. A handful of foreign correspondents and television news crews were in their midst, and many protesters saw their presence as a shield.

"This is the first time they have used gas," one veteran of the protests told a journalist as he retreated. "When you leave they will shoot us with machine guns."

But the militias did not wait. Moments later, with news cameras still rolling, they unleashed bursts of Kalashnikov fire. Sporadic gunfire rang out for over an hour.

A government spokesman later said the militia had fired into the air, but two doctors at the demonstration said that at least two people were wounded. The protesters, who had planned to stage a sit-in at the mosque, quickly scattered.

On the other front in what increasingly appears to be becoming a civil war, rebels fought Colonel Gaddafi's forces in a fierce, daylong battle for the eastern town of Ras Lanuf, the site of a military base and an oil terminal.

The road north of town thundered with explosions, and all day long, trucks mounted with guns and swarming with rebel fighters raced from the city of Brega, about 25 miles to the east, to the front. The better armed Gaddafi forces hammered the rebels with mortars and rocket-propelled grenades, and witnesses said the wounded kept arriving into the night at the Brega hospital.

There was a huge explosion outside Benghazi, the country's second-largest city and the cradle of the revolution. A rebel spokesman said it occurred at an ammunition storage facility, and it was unclear whether the explosion was caused by an airstrike or some other attack, or an accident.

In Tripoli, Internet access was cut off Friday, the traditional day for street protests after midday prayers around the Arab world. Some suspected that Colonel Gaddafi's government may have shut it down to impede organizing and communication by his opponents, just as President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt did before his ouster. Though Libya appears to lack the tech-savvy networks of young people that helped propel the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions, many Libyan protesters have used the Internet to circulate images of repression.

About 130 foreign journalists have gathered in Tripoli as guests of the Gaddafi government, and in a news conference on Thursday night designed to rebut charges of human rights violations, senior officials of the Foreign Ministry promised them unrestricted freedom of movement.

But on Friday morning, the government informed the journalists that it planned to fly them away from potential Friday protests to a Gaddafi stronghold in the south. When the journalists refused to go, the government temporarily locked them in their hotel, before arranging a bus trip to a central square that is a hub for pro-Gaddafi rallies.

But some journalists, including at least three British television news crews, escaped to a mosque in Tajura where a large demonstration had been held the week before. As men trickled into the mosque for midday prayers, heavily armed checkpoints were already springing up around the neighborhood, with two tanks alongside the main route along the Mediterranean to downtown.

Men entering the mosque said that at least five of their neighbors were killed by Gaddafi militias at a demonstration that brought out thousands here last week, and a doctor displayed cellphone photographs of four bodies severely wounded in the chest, head and eye. "They are experienced shooters," he said.

Many described a rash of midnight abductions as members of the militia searched from house to house for people who participated in past protests. One man said that five households in his family had been raided the same night. A young man described waking in the middle of the night to see a young neighbor being dragged from his home, women crying in the street around him. A third said he believed 100 of his neighbors had been detained in the past week, some released after a couple of days and others still gone. "Every night it is 10 or 15 houses," another said.

Even in the mosque's marble courtyard, some said they feared talking to a foreign journalist. "I am sorry," one whispered. "I can't talk to you. I am from here. Everybody knows me. But, really, we don't like Gaddafi."

Several said they were incensed that Colonel Gaddafi had said in a recent television interview that the Libyan people loved him. "We want to show that the number of people who hate Gaddafi is more," one said.

This week, several said, they had planned to pull back or stay in the mosque for a sit-in rather than risk an ambush or shootings at a march toward downtown. "It is impossible to advance here because you are faced with heavy gunfire," one man said.

Another said the plan had come from Benghazi. "Our government is in Benghazi now for all Libya," he said.

A plainclothes police officer introduced himself and demanded the names and news organizations of journalists present.

When the thousands of men who had prayed at the mosque began to file out around 1:45 p.m., a group of young men stood facing the door carrying the tri-colored pre-Gaddafi Libyan flag and chanting for others to demonstrate: "The blood of the martyrs will not be wasted." Anticipating foreign news media, a young man unfurled a banner in English: "No more killing. Peaceful protests."

But instead of rallying inside the relative safety of the mosque's large marble courtyard, the energized crowd quickly surged through the gates to a nearby roundabout, where protesters had been killed the week before. One man said his son was detained by security forces 10 days ago, and he was warned that if he protested he might never see him again.

"Even if he kills too many people, we will still do what we do," another vowed. "He is killing us for 41 years."

As cameramen scurried for the best angle, several thanked journalists for shielding them. "It is just because of the media we are safe," one said. "If you were not here we would see people killed."

By the time the crowd from the mosque reached the roundabout only about 300 protesters remained, the threats and detentions having done their work. The protesters lamented that militia roadblocks prevented others from joining them from other mosques.

Some said they were refraining from taking cellphone pictures of the demonstrations, since those doing so were now suspected of being government spies, taking pictures of protesters so the government can track them down.

At 2:45, two blue trucks packed with police officers bearing Kalashnikovs appeared at the end of the block.

Moments later, tear gas canisters were flying through the air and the crowd began to stampede. "Mosque, mosque!" some shouted, urging the whole crowd to retreat to its relative safety. Few listened.

Braving the gas and Kalashnikovs, some young men picked up stones to hurl at the militia. Then the militia opened fire. Their initial aim was unclear. But by then they had occupied the roundabout, blocking the way back to the mosque.

Journalists scattered, too, some taking refuge in private homes or businesses as heavily armed militia checkpoints locked down the neighborhood.

Around 2:00 a.m., several volleys of gunfire crackled over the capital. A long caravan of white double-cabin Toyota Tundra pick-up trucks, the vehicle of choice for pro-Gaddafi militias, was cruising through the streets, apparently firing their weapons in celebration of day's success

Gaddafi brutalises foes, armed or defenceless


Tripoli, Libya:  Col. Muammar el-Gaddafi counterattacked with brutal force on Friday, battling rebel forces on two fronts, firing on unarmed protesters in front of international news media and leaving the rebels seeking his ouster in disarray.

His militia's actions seemed likely to stir renewed debate over international intervention to limit his use of military power against his own citizens, possibly by imposing a no-flight zone.

About 30 miles outside the capital, the elite Khamis Brigade, a militia named for the Gaddafi son who commands it, surrounded the rebel-controlled town of Zawiyah and opened fire with mortars, machine guns and other heavy weapons, witnesses said, in two separate skirmishes.

The first was arguably provoked by rebels who tried to attack the better-equipped militia because it was blocking rebel supporters from entering the town, the witnesses said. But the second, described as a "massacre" by rebel witnesses, took aim at a group of unarmed protesters who attempted to march through the militia lines toward the capital.

A rebel making a count at the Zawiyah hospital said that at least 35 rebels and an unknown number of militia soldiers died in the fighting, with more than 60 rebels missing and more than 50 wounded. Among the dead, rebels said, was Col. Hussein Darbouk, a defected Libyan officer who had been commanding rebel forces in the town.

"We killed a lot of their people, but obviously they have more power than us, to be quite honest," said one rebel, who spoke on the condition of anonymity.

Others spoke of violence directed against unarmed civilians.

"I cannot describe the enormity of the violence they are committing against us," one resident said in a telephone interview, with gunfire in the background.

By nightfall there were contradictory reports about the fate of the city. A spokesman for the government said its forces had retaken Zawiyah. "It is liberated this afternoon," said the spokesman, Majid al-Dursi, "and we are going to take you there tomorrow to see for yourself."

But in interviews throughout the night, rebels said they still controlled the city up to its gates, though some said they worried about the night ahead -- especially after midnight, one witness said, after the electricity was cut off and the town went dark.

Around the same time as the afternoon battle in Zawiyah, two truckloads of government security officers showered hundreds of protesters with tear gas in the Tripoli suburb of Tajura. A handful of foreign correspondents and television news crews were in their midst, and many protesters saw their presence as a shield.

"This is the first time they have used gas," one veteran of the protests told a journalist as he retreated. "When you leave they will shoot us with machine guns."

But the militias did not wait. Moments later, with news cameras still rolling, they unleashed bursts of Kalashnikov fire. Sporadic gunfire rang out for over an hour.

A government spokesman later said the militia had fired into the air, but two doctors at the demonstration said that at least two people were wounded. The protesters, who had planned to stage a sit-in at the mosque, quickly scattered.

On the other front in what increasingly appears to be becoming a civil war, rebels fought Colonel Gaddafi's forces in a fierce, daylong battle for the eastern town of Ras Lanuf, the site of a military base and an oil terminal.

The road north of town thundered with explosions, and all day long, trucks mounted with guns and swarming with rebel fighters raced from the city of Brega, about 25 miles to the east, to the front. The better armed Gaddafi forces hammered the rebels with mortars and rocket-propelled grenades, and witnesses said the wounded kept arriving into the night at the Brega hospital.

There was a huge explosion outside Benghazi, the country's second-largest city and the cradle of the revolution. A rebel spokesman said it occurred at an ammunition storage facility, and it was unclear whether the explosion was caused by an airstrike or some other attack, or an accident.

In Tripoli, Internet access was cut off Friday, the traditional day for street protests after midday prayers around the Arab world. Some suspected that Colonel Gaddafi's government may have shut it down to impede organizing and communication by his opponents, just as President Hosni Mubarak of Egypt did before his ouster. Though Libya appears to lack the tech-savvy networks of young people that helped propel the Tunisian and Egyptian revolutions, many Libyan protesters have used the Internet to circulate images of repression.

About 130 foreign journalists have gathered in Tripoli as guests of the Gaddafi government, and in a news conference on Thursday night designed to rebut charges of human rights violations, senior officials of the Foreign Ministry promised them unrestricted freedom of movement.

But on Friday morning, the government informed the journalists that it planned to fly them away from potential Friday protests to a Gaddafi stronghold in the south. When the journalists refused to go, the government temporarily locked them in their hotel, before arranging a bus trip to a central square that is a hub for pro-Gaddafi rallies.

But some journalists, including at least three British television news crews, escaped to a mosque in Tajura where a large demonstration had been held the week before. As men trickled into the mosque for midday prayers, heavily armed checkpoints were already springing up around the neighborhood, with two tanks alongside the main route along the Mediterranean to downtown.

Men entering the mosque said that at least five of their neighbors were killed by Gaddafi militias at a demonstration that brought out thousands here last week, and a doctor displayed cellphone photographs of four bodies severely wounded in the chest, head and eye. "They are experienced shooters," he said.

Many described a rash of midnight abductions as members of the militia searched from house to house for people who participated in past protests. One man said that five households in his family had been raided the same night. A young man described waking in the middle of the night to see a young neighbor being dragged from his home, women crying in the street around him. A third said he believed 100 of his neighbors had been detained in the past week, some released after a couple of days and others still gone. "Every night it is 10 or 15 houses," another said.

Even in the mosque's marble courtyard, some said they feared talking to a foreign journalist. "I am sorry," one whispered. "I can't talk to you. I am from here. Everybody knows me. But, really, we don't like Gaddafi."

Several said they were incensed that Colonel Gaddafi had said in a recent television interview that the Libyan people loved him. "We want to show that the number of people who hate Gaddafi is more," one said.

This week, several said, they had planned to pull back or stay in the mosque for a sit-in rather than risk an ambush or shootings at a march toward downtown. "It is impossible to advance here because you are faced with heavy gunfire," one man said.

Another said the plan had come from Benghazi. "Our government is in Benghazi now for all Libya," he said.

A plainclothes police officer introduced himself and demanded the names and news organizations of journalists present.

When the thousands of men who had prayed at the mosque began to file out around 1:45 p.m., a group of young men stood facing the door carrying the tri-colored pre-Gaddafi Libyan flag and chanting for others to demonstrate: "The blood of the martyrs will not be wasted." Anticipating foreign news media, a young man unfurled a banner in English: "No more killing. Peaceful protests."

But instead of rallying inside the relative safety of the mosque's large marble courtyard, the energized crowd quickly surged through the gates to a nearby roundabout, where protesters had been killed the week before. One man said his son was detained by security forces 10 days ago, and he was warned that if he protested he might never see him again.

"Even if he kills too many people, we will still do what we do," another vowed. "He is killing us for 41 years."

As cameramen scurried for the best angle, several thanked journalists for shielding them. "It is just because of the media we are safe," one said. "If you were not here we would see people killed."

By the time the crowd from the mosque reached the roundabout only about 300 protesters remained, the threats and detentions having done their work. The protesters lamented that militia roadblocks prevented others from joining them from other mosques.

Some said they were refraining from taking cellphone pictures of the demonstrations, since those doing so were now suspected of being government spies, taking pictures of protesters so the government can track them down.

At 2:45, two blue trucks packed with police officers bearing Kalashnikovs appeared at the end of the block.

Moments later, tear gas canisters were flying through the air and the crowd began to stampede. "Mosque, mosque!" some shouted, urging the whole crowd to retreat to its relative safety. Few listened.

Braving the gas and Kalashnikovs, some young men picked up stones to hurl at the militia. Then the militia opened fire. Their initial aim was unclear. But by then they had occupied the roundabout, blocking the way back to the mosque.

Journalists scattered, too, some taking refuge in private homes or businesses as heavily armed militia checkpoints locked down the neighborhood.

Around 2:00 a.m., several volleys of gunfire crackled over the capital. A long caravan of white double-cabin Toyota Tundra pick-up trucks, the vehicle of choice for pro-Gaddafi militias, was cruising through the streets, apparently firing their weapons in celebration of day's success

Tamil Nadu: Congress-DMK rift over seat sharing worsens


PLAYClick to Expand & Play
Chennai:  Just a month ahead of Assembly polls in Tamil Nadu, the seven-year-old Congress-DMK alliance seems to be on the verge of collapse as the partners cannot agree on seat sharing. 

Sources have told NDTV that DMK's TR Baalu is likely to meet Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee to convey that the party could even withdraw its support to the UPA govt.

The two parties have held three rounds of discussions on seat sharing for the April 13 Assembly elections, but there has been little headway. The Congress wants to contest many more seats than the 48 it had fought on in the last elections and, if the alliance comes to power, wants to be included in the government.

DMK chief Karunanidhi is appalled.  He says he has offered 60 seats, but the 63 that the Congress wants is unfair.

In a statement in Chennai, Karunanidhi said, "According to the formula, both parties agreed the Congress would get only 51 seats. But we offered 60 seats. Is it right to demand 63 seats? Is it fair to expect us to okay constituencies they choose? DMK's high-level meet on Saturday will take an appropriate decision."

The DMK will hold an internal meeting on Saturday to discuss the Congress' demands, and will also discuss its election manifesto.

With all the controversy that the partners have been mired in in the last few months, coupled with the traditional anti-incumbency challenge, this will not be an easy election to fight. It does not help that the past few weeks have been tough on the Congress-DMK relationship with the CBI's investigation into the 2G scam extending to some of the DMK's senior-most leaders, including Karunanidhi's daughter Kanimozhi. A Raja, the DMK leader who was Telecom Minister till November and was forced to resign much to the DMK's chagrin, is now in jail.

Tamil Nadu will vote on April 13, and the results will be declared on May 13 for the state's 234 seats.

Mumbai fire: Slumdog child star loses home


Mumbai:  Child actor Rubina Ali, who featured in the Oscar-winning 'Slumdog Millionaire' has lost her home in the major fire that gutted several shanties in suburban Bandra.
    
"I have lost everything including the film memorabilia," Rubina said today.
    
The 12-year-old said she was inside her home when the fire broke out in the Garibnagar slums last night.
    
"So far, nobody has come to help us," she added.
    
Rubina played the young Latika in Danny Boyle's 2008 movie, which swept the 81st Academy Awards with eight Oscars.