Popular Posts

Friday, March 4, 2011

Chiru touted as next AP Deputy CM?



This may not be very good news for Chiranjeevi fans.
The megastar, who has entertained audiences in 149 films in his 34 year long film career, may soon bid a final adieu to filmdom.
The actor, who has successfully forayed into politics, was about to start his 150th film this year. The film was special for Chiru as his son Ram Charan Teja had planned to produce it as his gift to dad. And it was equally special for Chiru fans, who last saw their idol on the big screen in Shankar Dada Zindabad in 2007.
However, as per new winds of change in the political situation in Andhra Pradesh, Chiranjeevi is being seen as a strong contender for a seat as either the Union Cabinet minister or the Deputy Chief Minister. The development is due to Chiru's plan to merge his political party Prajarajyam with Congress.
If the alliance takes place and Chiru gets what is being promised, it goes without saying that the superstar will become busier than ever fulfilling his political duties. Considering all this, sources in tinsel ville think that it will be difficult for Chiru to find time to do films and plans for his 150th flick look shelved as of now.
V V Vinayak was reported to be directing the film, but it seems it will be long since fans get to see their star on screen again.

Chiru becomes Villain after Heroine!

Thu 17th Feb 2011 12:47 PM
Chiru becomes Villain after Heroine!


Ramgopal Varma is synonymous to sensationalism in Tollywood. He is ready to target all the big heroes on screen with ‘KSD Appalraju’ and off screen Varma seems to be loving to attack only and only chiranjeevi and his camp members. Two days ago, Ramu treated chiranjeevi as heroine and Congress as hero.
Less than 48 hours, Varma changed his mind to call chiranjeevi as Villain and YSR as hero. ‘If YSR is a hero then chiranjeevi is a villain but villainy is a perspective and heroism is relative from the pov of objectivistic thinkers,’ tweeted Ramgopal Varma. Now, who cares about the point of view of objectivistic thinkers…what mattes is the view point of Ramu on chiranjeevi.

Indian Americans upset after Rajat Gupta charge


Original
The latest issue of Desi Talk was about to be printed when news broke that Rajat Gupta, a former board member at Goldman Sachs, had been charged with insider trading.

Sunil Adam, editor of the newsweekly for Indians living in the United States, stopped the presses. It was sure to be the most talked-about story of the week. "Rajat Gupta was the first to redefine the image of Indian-Americans from cab drivers to wizards of business and finance," Adam says.

Indian executives make up a tight-knit, rarefied group in American business, populating investment banks, management consulting firms and Silicon Valley startups.

They worry that the accusations against Gupta by federal regulators of illegally passing information to a hedge fund manager before it became public, will cast a cloud over their community.

Gupta, 62, of Westport, Conn., headed the management consulting firm McKinsey & Co. from 1994 to 2003, the first non-Western executive to hold the job. He also served on the boards of several influential companies, including Goldman and Procter & Gamble.

"Rajat is an icon," says Vivek Wadhwa, a director of research at the Pratt School of Engineering at Duke University and a senior research associate at Harvard Law School. "Every community has its bad apples, but when someone as respected is implicated, it makes the entire barrel look bad."

The Securities and Exchange Commission says he passed information to Raj Rajaratnam, former head of the Galleon Group hedge funds, who himself is set to go on trial next week for insider trading. Regulators say Gupta was an investor in Galleon funds and a friend of the Sri Lankan born Rajaratnam.

At least two others in the same scandal are also Indian: Rajiv Goel, a former director of strategic investments at Intel Capital and Anil Kumar, a former director at McKinsey, who have both pleaded guilty.

Wadhwa says the scandal hits the community especially hard because Indian professionals are used to more positive portrayals. A study conducted by the University of California at Berkeley found that 15 percent of Silicon Valley startups between 1995 and 2005 were launched by Indians, the largest number for any immigrant group. Indians make up less than 1 percent of the U.S. population.

In addition, 40 percent of Indians in the United States have a master's degree, a doctorate or another professional degree, the highest of any ethnic group and five times the national average.

Gupta, the former chairman of the International Chamber of Commerce, had a powerful sphere of influence. It included former President Bill Clinton and Microsoft founder Bill Gates. In November, he was photographed shaking hands with Korean President Lee Myung-bak at the Group of 20 economic summit.

Now, though, many of Gupta's friends and close associates may be distancing themselves. The Associated Press contacted 10 board members and trustees at the America India Foundation, which Gupta helped found and does philanthropy work in India.

Only one trustee got back. Navneet Chugh, founder of California corporate law firm The Chugh Firm, said Gupta had gone out of his way to help social and charitable organizations and that he was disappointed about the charges. Others didn't return messages from the AP.

The SEC says the inside information from Gupta helped make $18 million for Rajaratnam's fund at the depths of the financial crisis in 2008. Gupta's attorney, Gary Naftalis, has called the allegations "totally baseless."

Regulators say the information included tipping Rajaratnam in September 2008 that Warren Buffett's Berkshire Hathaway was going to invest $5 billion in Goldman. Rajaratnam bought Goldman stock and sold it the next day at a $1 million profit.

Gupta could be fined and barred from serving as an officer in a public company. He remains on the board at the parent company of American Airlines and at Harman International Industries Inc., a consumer electronics company.

Since Gupta, many other Indian-born executives have reached the top, including Citigroup CEO Vikram Pandit, Pepsico CEO Indra Nooyi and Motorola's Sanjay Jha. However, Gupta's list of accomplishments was long and his reach much wider.

Orphaned at 18, Gupta joined the prestigious Indian Institute of Technology and was admitted to Harvard Business School in 1971. He has served on advisory boards of the top business schools, including Harvard and the University of Pennsylvania's Wharton School. Today he is chairman of New Silk Route Partners, a $1.4 billion private equity fund.

A new generation of Indians was particularly inspired by his role as a mentor and his philanthropic ventures. Gupta helped raise money for Pratham, a nonprofit that provides primary education for children in India, and is an adviser to Avahan, the India AIDS initiative of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation. He was also chair of The Global Fund to Fight Aids, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

Tushar Aggarwal, a final-year master's student at Wharton, worked at Goldman in 2003 and remembers Gupta's as willing to advise and talk philanthropy with an informal group of Indian-Americans at the investment bank.

"He focused on giving back to the community, and I look at him as someone who raised the bar for many of us pursuing an MBA," says Aggarwal, who plans on going back to his native India after he graduates from business school this year.

Aggarwal is also chair this year of the Wharton India Economic Forum, an annual conference that brings top Indian business leaders to talk about opportunities and challenges in India. Gupta has been a keynote speaker at the event. Aggarwal says he and the network of students and professionals who knew Gupta are devastated at the charges.

"The broader community is shocked and sad," says Aggarwal. "He didn't need money or access, or prestige or any favors. He was already at the pinnacle."


Steel executive dies after workers attack him in Orissa



Bhubaneswar:  A senior executive of Powmex Steel in Orissa has died in hospital after he was attacked by factory workers. 

RS Ray, who was the Deputy General Manager of the steel plant that's based in Orissa's Titalagarh district, was in his car when it was set on fire.

Workers at the steel plant are on strike, demanding higher salaries.

Reports that 11 employees had been fired reportedly provoked a mob to set Mr Ray's car on fire.


The executive managed to exit the car but sustained 60 per cent burns. He was taken to a hospital in Rourkela, which is 500 km away, since hospitals closer to the factory do not have burns wards. 

Nobody has been arrested so far for Mr Ray's death.

CVC case: Thomas may consider filing review petition, says his lawyer

New Delhi:  PJ Thomas' counsel, Wills Mathews, has indicated that Mr Thomas may consider filing a review petition against the Supreme Court order quashing his appointment as Central Vigilance Commissioner (CVC). (Read: Who is PJ Thomas?)

Speaking to PTI, Mr Mathews dismissed reports that Thomas has resigned and said that he would go through the judgement and consider "whether to resign or to file a review petition". He added that Thomas has not yet gone through the judgement and would take a decision only after perusing it.

"I just talked to him. He was prepared to resign long back but at that time there was a legal opinion that he should not resign. So he continued," the counsel said.

Citing the provisions in the CVC Act, Mr Mathews said he can be removed only by the President or alternatively he can resign.

On Thursday, the Supreme Court ruled that PJ Thomas' appointment as CVC is illegal. The government will issue a notification today quashing Thomas' appointment.

The Supreme Court judgement comes at a time when the government is being taken to task by the Opposition for a glut of corruption scandals. "I respect the Supreme Court's judgement," said the Prime Minister to NDTV. He said he will make a statement in Parliament on the controversy.

Dr Manmohan Singh is now in the direct line of fire of the Opposition since he headed the committee that chose Mr Thomas.

Mr Thomas was selected in September by the Prime Minister and Home Minister. The third member of the committee, Leader of the Opposition Sushma Swaraj, had objected strongly because Mr Thomas is accused of corruption himself in a criminal case that goes back to the early 90s, when he was a senior bureaucrat in Kerala.

Like Ms Swaraj, the Supreme Court has stressed during the trial that Mr Thomas cannot be in charge of fighting corruption as the Central Vigilance Commissioner when his own integrity is being questioned. In its judgement on Thursday, the court said, "The touchstone for the appointment of the CVC is the institutional integrity as well as the personal integrity of the candidate." The judges, headed by Chief Justice Kapadia, did clarify that they were not questioning Mr Thomas' personal integrity.

The government, in its defense, had argued in court that the biodata for Mr Thomas considered by the PM did not refer to the corruption charges against him. The Supreme Court has rejected that stand, stating that the committee headed by the PM should have "gone beyond the documents" presented to it.

The court also said that the government was incorrect in suggesting that because the post of Central Vigilance Commissioner is a constitutional one, the Supreme Court is not entitled to review the appointment. The court said that while the government "is not accountable to the courts in respect of policy decisions...however, they are accountable for the legality of such decisions."  (Supreme Court judgement on CVC: Read full text) - Courtesy Supreme Court website

Ms Swaraj, who has voiced her opposition to Mr Thomas' appointment at different public forums, tweeted after the verdict, "The dignity of the office of CVC has been restored." The Left and the BJP now also want a debate in Parliament on why the government insisted on Mr Thomas as its choice.

As Food Secretary in Kerala in the early 90s, Mr Thomas campaigned aggressively for the import of edible oil from Malaysia. It later emerged that the price paid for the oil - palmolein - was unjustifiably high. He has since been charged with corruption and conspiracy.

Those charges are the reason why his appointment has been challenged in the Supreme Court by different Public Interest Litigation cases.

Mr Thomas had repeatedly told the court that the fact that he was promoted over the last few years by the Vigilance Commission proves that the charges against him are incorrect and should not affect his career.   

The 71-page verdict written by Justice Kapadia noted that in addition to the pending corruption case against Mr Thomas, the Department of Personnel and Training (DoPT) had repeatedly recommended "penalty proceedings" against him between 2000 and 2004. The PM's committee, the court said, had overlooked these black marks in Mr Thomas' record.

The court judgement on Mr Thomas comes at a time when the government has been bruised black and blue by a steady stream of scams. Leading that list is the 2G spectrum scam which pushed A Raja from the Telecom Minister's office into jail. Mr Raja stands accused of abusing his position and manipulating government policies to award licences for mobile networks at throwaway prices to companies that rewarded him privately with huge kickbacks.

Mr Thomas was Telecom Secretary till he was made Central Vigilance Commissioner. The Supreme Court, which is also monitoring the CBI's investigation into the spectrum scam, suggested that it would be inappropriate for Mr Thomas to preside over an inquiry that could subject his own actions in the Telecom Ministry to scrutiny. Mr Thomas then recused himself from the 2G investigation.

New guidelines for choosing Central Vigilance Commissioner

In its judgement on Thursday, the Supreme Court has provided guidelines for all future appointments of government secretaries and constitutional posts.

Based on Mr Thomas' case, committee members who dissent or over-rule dissent must explain their reasons. Any relevant information should not be withheld from the selection committee. Civil servants should not alone be considered for these positions. "All the civil servants and other persons empanelled shall be outstanding civil servants or persons of impeccable integrity," the court said. (With PTI Inputs)

Anger again in Andhra Assembly over Telangana



Andhra Pradesh Chief Minister N Kiran Kumar Reddy today said the Centre would take a decision on the contentious statehood issue only after the eight recognised political parties in the state expressed their views on it.
 
"It is a procedure....We have to follow it. The Centre will take a decision after the political parties expressed their views after studying the recommendations of
the Justice Srikrishna Committee," the Chief Minister said in the state Assembly, minutes before the proceedings were adjourned for half-an-hour following slogan shouting by Telugu Desam Party members.

The Centre would convene a meeting again to elicit views of all parties after they studied the Justice Srikrishna Committee report thoroughly, he added.

Appealing to the agitated TDP MLAs, who disrupted the Assembly proceedings demanding that the Centre keep Andhra Pradesh united, to maintain calm, the Chief Minister pointed out that the state was facing many problems at this juncture.

"Annual examinations are round the corner. Lakhs of students have to write the examinations. Let us all create a peaceful atmosphere so that they can write the exams without any problem," Kiran said.

He criticised the TDP for not even attending the all-party meeting convened by the Centre to handover the five-member Committee report.

Hitting back at the Chief Minister, Telugu Desam Legislature Party deputy leader Gali Muddukrishnama Naidu questioned the silence of AICC chief Sonia Gandhi on the statehood issue.

"Did Sonia Gandhi open her mouth so far on the issue?

Even the Congress party has not clearly spelt out its stand," Muddukrishnama pointed out.

"The Congress is solely responsible for the current political and administrative uncertainty prevailing in the state. Since the party is in power both at the Centre and in the state, it should take action on the statehood issue immediately," the TDP leader said.

TDP MLAs from Andhra-Rayalaseema regions then rushed into the Well of the House holding placards and raising slogans in support of a unified state.

Standing at their respective positions, the four CPI MLAs raised the Telangana demand as a counter.

Deputy Speaker Nadendla Manohar appealed for order, recalling the promise made by floor leaders of all parties during a meeting yesterday to let the House run smoothly from today.
 
But the din continued and the Deputy Speaker adjourned the proceedings for 30 minutes.

CBI to file chargesheet against Justice Nirmal Yadav today



New Delhi:  On the day that she was meant to retire, a chargesheet will be filed against Justice Nirmal Yadav of the Uttarakhand High Court for corruption.

President Pratibha Patil allegedly sanctioned Justice Yadav's prosecution on February 28.

Justice Yadav is being investigated by the CBI for corruption. In 2008, Justice Yadav was serving at the Punjab and Haryana High court when Rs. 15 lakh was offered as a bribe to another woman judge in the same court - that was allegedly a mistake made by a businessman who wanted Justice Yadav to rule in his favour.

The sanction to prosecute a sitting High Court judge can only be given by the President who is the appointing authority. The President usually consults the Chief Justice of India (CJI) for whether to proceed. In this case, Justice SH Kapadia advised her to proceed.


CJI KG Balakrishnan, who has retired and is now himself being accused of corruption, had formed a three-judge committee to probe the allegations. In December 2008, that committee reportedly recommended action against Justice Yadav, who challenged the findings, terming them biased.

Since then, the case against Justice Yadav has remained suspended, with the CBI waiting for permission to begin formal proceedings against her.